In an interview In The Hindustan Times' Brunch magazine, June 26, 2011 (Sorry, no link is available), Amitav Ghosh was rightly asked if his "Ibis" novels could become a history book in disguise. His answer:
"I could never write a history book in disguise really because..because I am a novelist. I am a writer of fiction. That's what I do. To write history is a very particular thing. It calls for specific talents, which are not ma talents, you know. It's not something that can happen. First and foremost, I'm a storyteller."
I have no problem in admitting that he's an astute storyteller. But is the stuff that Ghosh has been churning out for some years now can really be called literature?
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Subscribe To
Posts
Posts
Search This Blog
Labels
Bengali literature
"2666"
1Q84
'A' literature
Alice Munro
Arundhati Roy interview
$665000 advance
10 forbidden classics
2010 Nobel Prize winner in literature
A Suitable Boy
A.S.Byatt
Aagunpakhi
Aamer Hussein
Adam Bodor interview
Alasdair Gray interview
Ali Sethi
Amitav Ghosh interview
Anne Enright on Failure
Arundhati Roy on fiction
Bolano's last interview
Carlos Fuentes dies
Chinua Achebe interview
Cormac McCarthy
Dave Eggers on publishing
Deborah Levy on writing and reading
Dumitru Tsepeneag
Eleanor Catton wins the Man Booker Prize 2013
Franz Kafka's dog story
George Saunders and his editor
Gunter Grass's 1990 diary
an unremarkable man
My Blog List
-
-
AI-generated poetry3 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
Briefly Noted Book Reviews7 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
Literary family feuds4 years ago
-
-
-
Moving Announcement!6 years ago
-
-
-
Donald Trump’s New Deal9 years ago
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment