Probably no one alive is a better novelist than Jonathan Franzen, and this is frustrating because his novels are awful, excellent but awful, books you read quickly and remember ponderously, books of exhaustive craft and yet a weird, spiraling cluelessness about the data they exhaustively collate. They analyze the wave frequency but don’t hear the sound. They are full of people who talk and act exactly as you imagine such people would talk and act in real life; everyone in them is forever buying the right brand of granola bar or having believable thoughts about their mother or fantasizing in a particularly characteristic way about fucking on a hotel-room air conditioner. And yet they don’t feel like real life. They feel like real life irritably recreated from a spreadsheet, by someone who is a genius at reading spreadsheets. Whether a novel ought to feel like real life is of course a separate question. Many novels that I love don’t, but those novels aren’t trying to, and as far as I can tell, Franzen’s are.
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Subscribe To
Posts
Posts
Search This Blog
Labels
Bengali literature
"2666"
1Q84
'A' literature
Alice Munro
Arundhati Roy interview
$665000 advance
10 forbidden classics
2010 Nobel Prize winner in literature
A Suitable Boy
A.S.Byatt
Aagunpakhi
Aamer Hussein
Adam Bodor interview
Alasdair Gray interview
Ali Sethi
Amitav Ghosh interview
Anne Enright on Failure
Arundhati Roy on fiction
Bolano's last interview
Carlos Fuentes dies
Chinua Achebe interview
Cormac McCarthy
Dave Eggers on publishing
Deborah Levy on writing and reading
Dumitru Tsepeneag
Eleanor Catton wins the Man Booker Prize 2013
Franz Kafka's dog story
George Saunders and his editor
Gunter Grass's 1990 diary
an unremarkable man
My Blog List
-
-
AI-generated poetry3 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
Briefly Noted Book Reviews7 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
Literary family feuds4 years ago
-
-
-
Moving Announcement!6 years ago
-
-
-
Donald Trump’s New Deal9 years ago
-
-
-
-
No comments:
Post a Comment